You need to register and login to create and read (some) posts

Cancel culture, the “Twitter mob” and Stoning the Adulteress — John 8: 1–11

I recently noticed some conservative Republican apparatchik using a passage from a bible story to slam democrats and progressives. It was the “Jesus Delivers the Adulterous Woman” story, found here in several versions. As this person tells the story, a mob of people had gathered to stone a woman. Seeing this, Jesus said, “he that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone.” After saying this, the mob of people file away. The apparatchik then goes on to say that “if Jesus pulled that on Twitter, the mob would stone her then dox Jesus and get him fired from the Galilee Costco.”

Ha, ha, ha.

You see what he did there? He weaponized a bible story to attack democrats and progressives. He suggested, supported by his peculiar presentation of the story, that the progressive “Twitter mob” were not like Jesus at all. Like Jesus defending the adulterous woman, obviously, Jesus would just forgive racism, sexism, and all that other jazz that the “Twitter mob” seems so dead said against.

This would be funny, I suppose, except that this fellow clearly did not read the passage he was weaponizing. If he had, he would have realized that the story he was using applied more to the behaviour of violent, patriarchal elites than it did to some mythical, irrational “mob.”

What’s really happening in this passage is that Jesus is attacking elite privilege and power. Jesus is there to teach the people who have shown up to peacefully hear his deep spiritual wisdom. The local elites ( the “teachers of the law and the Pharisees”) arrive not because they wanted to hear Jesus teach, but because they wanted to “trap” him. They wanted to “have a basis for accusing him” so they could arrest him and throw him in jail. In order to do this, they “brought in a woman caught in adultery….” and ask Jesus if he would follow the law and recommend that she be stoned to death. They knew what Jesus was like. He tended to side with the underdog. They figured that if they could catch him advising something unlawful, specifically that the woman shouldn’t be punished even though she was a sinful adulteress, then they would have a basis for his arrest.

Unfortunately for the clods who showed up to trap Jesus, he knew they were trying to trap him. Instead of responding in a way that would incriminate him in the eyes of the law, he skillfully pushed it back on the elites by saying to them and not the mob, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.” With this brilliant statement, he referenced the elites own “sins,” got them to think of their own hypocrisy, invoked disjuncture, thereby silencing them and sending them away in quiet shame. In my view, this is a brilliant story about a brilliant spiritual teacher. But you can read the full story and judge for yourself.

If you read the above story, you’ll see, Jesus is not pointing a finger at a restless “cancel culture” mob, as the apparatchik suggested. He is also not forgiving racism, sexism, or homophobia, as this republican operative had implied. Instead, he is sparring with local political and economic elites who are trying to trap him and have him arrested by asking him to apply sexist and misogynist laws. In this context, Jesus is the model for Twitter “mob.” Jesus is in fact rejecting, i.e., cancelling, authoritarian and elite laws and the gender oppressions which they support. He is encouraging a more egalitarian, less violent, perspective. If you read the story I am sure you will see, this is the correct interpretation. Resistance to power, patriarchy, and authority is the moral of the story. The Republican apparatchik could only make his claims because, clearly, he did not read the whole story.

This bible story is fascinating from both a sociological and psychological perspective. It shows Jesus directly confronting sexism and violent relations of power. It also identifies Jesus as a progressive social actor coming up against regressive political and economic forces bent on removing his influence from society. It also highlights a question: why are the elites out to get Jesus? According to the New Testament, he was sent by God to teach the people. Why did the elites want to trap him with legal trickery? Why did they want to arrest him?

The answer, if you are interested, can be found in the article “Rethinking the Origins and Purpose of Religion: Jesus, Constantine, and the Containment of Global Revolution.” It is simple though. Jesus was an anti-authoritarian revolutionary who wanted to usher in a utopia for all people, not just the “chosen few,” but for women, children, the poor, and all those thrown in jail but an unjust and exploitative system.

The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind[folded], to set the oppressed free…. Luke 4: 18.

As such, he was a threat to the elites and their system of political and economic exploitation. They wanted, they needed, to stop that threat. They couldn’t just have him arrested because he was too popular amongst the people; instead, they invoked the law, tradition, and violence in an attempt to create conditions where they could throw him in jail. Of course, it didn’t work, this time. In this story, a brilliant Jesus gets the better of them. Unfortunately, we all know how the story ends. Eventually, the elites to succeed in arresting and executing Jesus. That’s a story which for another time.

-- All you need is love...

Recent forum posts

building a better and more inclus …
building a better and more inclus …
building a better and more inclus …
building a better and more inclus …
building a better and more inclus …
building a better and more inclus …
Coordinated efforts to suppress p …
Skip to toolbar